<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Computer-Chess Wiki Forum</title>
<link>http://www.computer-chess.org/forum/</link>
<description>Computer-Chess Discussion Forum</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Fire 4 - the experts speech</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by Gerhard, Monday, November 30, 2015, 15:40:</em></p><p><p>Hi Ron</p>
<p>Have already contacted one expert, but waiting for reply.<br />
In the meanwhile i found this thread ....</p>
<p>The experts speech:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.php?start=10&amp;t=56658&amp;topic_view=threads">http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.php?start=10&amp;t=56658&amp;topic_view=threads</a></p>
<p>You only get success to this thread when you are member of talkchess</p>
<p>... more i must not know .... i will not include it to my tournament</p>
<p>Best to you<br />
Gerhard</p>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.computer-chess.org/forum/index.php?id=3081</link>
<guid>http://www.computer-chess.org/forum/index.php?id=3081</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 15:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Tournaments</category>
<dc:creator>Gerhard</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fire 4 - put it into tournament?</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by Ron, Monday, November 30, 2015, 01:23:</em></p><p><p>Hi Gerhard,</p>
<p>All of the authors in your similarity tests have unclear reputations with Norman probably being the cleanest of them (lately). Maybe you could contact other tournament directors and discus your concerns. Maybe: Guenther Simon, Werner Schüle and Graham Banks</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Ron</p>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.computer-chess.org/forum/index.php?id=3079</link>
<guid>http://www.computer-chess.org/forum/index.php?id=3079</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 01:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Tournaments</category>
<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fire 4 - put it into tournament?</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by Gerhard, Thursday, November 26, 2015, 09:43:</em></p><p><p>on the other hand ...</p>
<p>on other lists </p>
<p><a href="http://spcc.beepworld.de/top-bullet-list.htm">http://spcc.beepworld.de/top-bullet-list.htm</a></p>
<p>Fire 4 is close to close with Gull 3</p>
<p> 18 Gull 3 x64              : 3113    3    3 24000    37.8 %   3200   40.4 %<br />
 19 Fire 4 x64              : 3102    3    3 24000    36.5 %   3201   40.1 %</p>
<p>also its a high number of remis games in compare to others, that must say truly nothing, but it can</p>
<p>19 Fire 4 x64            : 3102 24000 (+3934,=9635,-10431), 36.5 %</p>
<p><code class="monospace"><br />
Stockfish 151015 x64&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; : 1000 (+ 70,=381,-549), 26.1 %<br />
Mars 3.42 x64&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: 1000 (+300,=409,-291), 50.5 %<br />
Mars 3.41 x64&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: 1000 (+300,=443,-257), 52.1 %<br />
Sugar Pro 1.0 x64&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: 1000 (+ 74,=354,-572), 25.1 %<br />
Komodo 9.2 x64&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; : 1000 (+123,=334,-543), 29.0 %<br />
Stockfish 150817 x64&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; : 1000 (+ 89,=377,-534), 27.8 %<br />
Komodo 9.1 x64&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; : 1000 (+105,=376,-519), 29.3 %<br />
Stockfish 150604 x64&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; : 1000 (+ 91,=390,-519), 28.6 %<br />
Sugar 5.3b x64&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; : 1000 (+ 98,=399,-503), 29.8 %<br />
Stockfish 150510 x64&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; : 1000 (+ 93,=376,-531), 28.1 %<br />
Komodo 9 x64&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; : 1000 (+127,=349,-524), 30.1 %<br />
Sugar 150414 x64&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; : 1000 (+ 88,=396,-516), 28.6 %<br />
Stockfish 150410 x64&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; : 1000 (+118,=391,-491), 31.4 %<br />
Sugar 5.2a x64&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; : 1000 (+114,=390,-496), 30.9 %<br />
Sugar 5.1 x64s&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; : 1000 (+112,=375,-513), 29.9 %<br />
Stockfish 6 150128&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; : 1000 (+116,=399,-485), 31.6 %<br />
Firenzina 2.4.3 x64s&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; : 1000 (+350,=398,-252), 54.9 %<br />
Critter 1.6a x64&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; : 1000 (+277,=437,-286), 49.5 %<br />
Mars 3.35 x64&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: 1000 (+327,=415,-258), 53.5 %<br />
Stockfish 150105 x64&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; : 1000 (+135,=398,-467), 33.4 %<br />
Komodo 8 x64&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; : 1000 (+179,=390,-431), 37.4 %<br />
Houdini 4 x64&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: 1000 (+176,=387,-437), 37.0 %<br />
Gull 3 x64&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; : 1000 (+177,<strong>=609</strong>,-214), 48.1 %<br />
Equinox 3.3 x64&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: 1000 (+295,=462,-243), 52.6 %<br />
</code></p>
<p>and its own number in sim-test is about 10 points less than others,<br />
when add this 10 to the number Gull 3 gives we have about 58,<br />
so it could be a modified Gull3 ? - i dont know</p>
<p>- its closed scource<br />
- exe file is about 25mb = very very strange<br />
- programmer reputation is not clear for me</p>
<p>... i change my mind = i will not add it to tournament</p>
<p>maybe someone convince me to do the contrary</p>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.computer-chess.org/forum/index.php?id=3078</link>
<guid>http://www.computer-chess.org/forum/index.php?id=3078</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Tournaments</category>
<dc:creator>Gerhard</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fire 4 - put it into tournament?</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by Gerhard, Thursday, November 26, 2015, 07:51:</em></p><p><p>on <a href="http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/404/">http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/404/</a></p>
<p>Fire 4 ist 10 elo above Critter 1.6a<br />
and about 150 elo below Stockfish 6<br />
also Gull 3 is round 30 elo above it</p>
<p>when it uses the &quot;Twinfish-trick&quot; to hack the sim-test</p>
<p><a href="http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=51121&amp;start=20">http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=51121&amp;start=20</a></p>
<p>and</p>
<p><a href="http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=28444">http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=28444</a></p>
<p>it should have more relationship to Stockfish, but it has not ... so I think the engine is ok</p>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.computer-chess.org/forum/index.php?id=3077</link>
<guid>http://www.computer-chess.org/forum/index.php?id=3077</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 07:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Tournaments</category>
<dc:creator>Gerhard</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fire 4 - put it into tournament?</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by Gerhard, Thursday, November 26, 2015, 06:41:</em></p><p><p>i tend to put the engine into tournament</p>
<p>in the past the programmer was known as a bad boy, but he apologized and go on to step to a better guy. The sim test shows what he stated in his read me. </p>
<p>we know the sim test is only one of several parameters</p>
<p>someone having more knowledge in that case please let me know</p>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.computer-chess.org/forum/index.php?id=3076</link>
<guid>http://www.computer-chess.org/forum/index.php?id=3076</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 06:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Tournaments</category>
<dc:creator>Gerhard</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fire 4 read me</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by Gerhard, Thursday, November 26, 2015, 05:58:</em></p><p><p>Fire 4</p>
<p>a strong freeware UCI chess engine designed for modern Windows systems<br />
by Norman Schmidt</p>
<p>included in this release:</p>
<p>new search<br />
new and improved eval<br />
humanistic analysis<br />
extensive search, pst, and eval parameter tuning<br />
improved material table initialization and phase calculation<br />
thread local storage SMP up to 64 threads<br />
common endgame eval routines<br />
support for Syzygy endgame tablebases<br />
significant increase in playing strength</p>
<p><strong>Fire 4 has been completely re-engineered from top to bottom, and does not use any source code from (or closely related to) Ippolit.<br />
</strong></p>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.computer-chess.org/forum/index.php?id=3075</link>
<guid>http://www.computer-chess.org/forum/index.php?id=3075</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 05:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Tournaments</category>
<dc:creator>Gerhard</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fire 3 - Similarity Test</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by Gerhard, Thursday, November 26, 2015, 05:56:</em></p><p><p>sim version 3<br />
------ Fire 3.0 x64 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0) ------<br />
 67.53  Firenzina 2.3.2 xTreme x64 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 65.74  Mars 1 noneSSE x64 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 65.62  Fire 2.2 xTreme NS 2014 x64 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 64.69  Mars 3.42 x64 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 64.34  PanChess 00.611 x64 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 62.89  Houdini 1.5a w32 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 62.37  RobboLito 0.10 SMP w32 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 61.69  Bouquet 1.8 x64 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 61.30  BlackMamba 2.0 x64 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 61.12  IvanHoe 9.46b w32 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 60.48  RobboLite 0.085d3 w32 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 60.42  Strelka 5.5 x32 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 60.16  Strelka 6 w32 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 60.00  Critter 1.6a 32-bit (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 59.74  IvanHoe 9.87b w32 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 59.26  Equinox 3.20 x64mp (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 58.85  Equinox 3.30 x64mp (time: 101 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 58.73  PanChess 00.611 x64 (time: 27 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 58.11  Equinox 3.30 x64mp (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 54.83  Robbolito 0.10 (time: 26 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 54.52  BlackMamba 1.0 w32 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 53.67  Naum 4.6 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 53.44  IvanHoe 999946b (time: 27 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 53.41  Komodo TCECr 64-bit  (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 53.37  Fire 2.2 (time: 27 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 53.29  Gull 3 x64 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 53.23  Murka 3 x64 UCI (time: 690 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 53.17  Murka 3 x64 UCI (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 53.14  RobboLito 0.085d8 (time: 27 ms  scale: 1.0)</p>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.computer-chess.org/forum/index.php?id=3074</link>
<guid>http://www.computer-chess.org/forum/index.php?id=3074</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 05:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Tournaments</category>
<dc:creator>Gerhard</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fire 4 - Similarity Test - Give me your opinion !</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Posting by Gerhard, Thursday, November 26, 2015, 05:53:</em></p><p><p>sim version 3<br />
------ Fire 4 x64 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0) ------<br />
 58.90  Fire 4 x64 (time: 101 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 48.22  Gull 3 x64 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 45.29  Rybka 3 Human (time: 37 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 45.11  Rybka 3 (time: 33 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.90  RobboLito 0.085d3 (time: 27 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.82  PanChess 00.611 x64 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.71  Equinox 3.30 x64mp (time: 27 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.70  Rybka 3 Dynamic (time: 42 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.65  Strelka 6 w32 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.63  Robbolito 0.10 (time: 26 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.63  RobboLite 0.085d3 w32 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.63  Philou 3.51 (time: 1208 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.55  Houdini 1.00 (time: 29 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.53  Rybka 2.3.2a 32-bit  (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.48  Rybka 1.1 (time: 121 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.48  Equinox 3.30 x64mp (time: 101 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.46  IvanHoe 9.87b w32 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.45  Stockfish 4 64 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.44  Strelka R-3-E (time: 42 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.40  Naum 4.6 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.38  Tankist 3 32-bit (time: 33 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.38  Critter 1.01 (time: 35 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.37  RobboLito 0.085d1 (time: 27 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.36  RobboLito 0.085d8 (time: 27 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.32  BlackMamba 1.0 w32 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.31  Philou 3.60 (time: 686 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.28  Tankist 1.1 32-bit (time: 33 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.27  RobboLito 0.10 SMP w32 (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)<br />
 44.27  Critter 1.6a 32-bit (time: 100 ms  scale: 1.0)</p>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.computer-chess.org/forum/index.php?id=3073</link>
<guid>http://www.computer-chess.org/forum/index.php?id=3073</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 05:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Tournaments</category>
<dc:creator>Gerhard</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>